May 1, 2022 | Chris Paul on SubStack
Are any of the @q posts newsworthy in and of themselves? They’re not breaking stories. Or are they?
The events that shape our world are knowable in real time. With a well-constructed map of provable reality to depend on, you know what to look for and how to find it. A well-constructed map, an understanding of the terrain, allows for new information to be incorporated into the picture of the whole. Events in reality are not discrete or random. They exist inside a larger interpretation of reality. If they do not fit a prior understanding of reality, then the prior understanding of reality must be expanded. The map must account for the terrain or else the map is useless.
Small stories from across the world begin with local, independent reporting. People in well-connected information networks - from a few friends and neighbors, to massive alternative social media followings - spread those local stories. Important and vetted information gets spread wider and as it spreads, it is further vetted. It’s not long before genuine experts in any given field are vetting the information for themselves. This vetting process is what gives the stories their substance because our experts are telling the truth, knowing their lives can be destroyed by doing so. These stories go viral, already vetted. The mainstream media is then forced to debunk the stories, and they fail at an increasing rate to do this. If the debunking fails before people forget about the true story, then a distraction to shift the mainstream narrative is necessary. Something dangerous or salacious works best.
It should be clear that this process represents a better model for the flow of information. It is far more likely to produce an informed population than what we are given: Double-masking: Why some infectious disease experts say it's a good idea.
Trust The Science. Follow The Science. When they are attacking me, they’re attacking The Science.
When legitimate experts explain the data and give their analysis directly to the public, allowing for questions, the need for an intermediary is eliminated. The media is bypassed. It becomes immediately obvious that the media’s role is to disseminated the narratives of the interests it is paid to represent. The financial records back this up. The ubiquity of big pharma advertisements and overt sponsorship back it up. Even their guest lineup proves it. Why do all of the most powerful interests in the world agree that the world must #standwithukraine, even if it means World War III?
Why does Tucker Carlson have the only opposing viewpoint in the whole of mainstream media?
It is incorrect, at this point, to imagine that the global mainstream media constitutes ‘The News’ in any way. This a mistake most people still make. “The news” is a story about what happens in reality, told honestly. Analysis of ‘the news’ should include an absolute bias for hidden truths, especially when the powerful benefit from the hiding.
Most people accept that the mainstream media’s overt worship of The Truth is a thin veil over various biases, occasionally ideological, but mostly due to various corporate and social requirements.
Despite realizing this, people emotionally connect to the hosts, or guests, or brand of anger, and they convince themselves that the biases have disappeared. Very few in the mainstream media’s audience would deny their favorite sources are biased. They know it’s not true, and they calculate the embarrassment of exposing themselves as ‘someone who doesn’t know that’ being more harmful than admitting someone else’s bias. Because they identify as ‘someone who holds the right viewpoint’, they will happily admit (around certain people) that they watch MSNBC. They do this to signal to their peers that they’re not “QAnon” or a “Fox News viewer”. The bias is fully understood, but it makes no difference, because what they watch makes them feel so right.
The cultural enforcement of thought and behavior is the greatest weapon in an information war. The party controlling the flow of information has a powerful upper hand. The urge to control and limit the flow of information to the people only comes when the full flow of information will damage the party in control. Censoring beneficial speech, they think, is counterproductive. Controlling the flow of information can only be done through force, and effective force requires power. The goal of the restriction of speech is to misinform and control what the people think, to the benefit of the powerful.
The powerful are losing their ability to control the flow of information because the technology has been turned against them. We have a better weapon on our side. We care. We’re relentless. We tell the truth. We’re learning the minute details of current events while the mainstream media spends every second debunking the truth with layers of provable falsehoods while saying “you can’t trust those conspiracy theorists!” We’re better at moving and analyzing information. We have discernment.
The overwhelming majority of the people in and around the truth community are Christians of deep faith - men and women of all races and financial classes - who believe it is their moral obligation to do what they can to resist and reject evil by doing good. And there is evil. It’s everywhere.
If your response to the presence of evil everywhere is to blame the people on the other side and censor them, it may be time to consider your role in participating in the evil that exists everywhere.
But doesn’t the truth community think the same about a different group of people? No, actually.
Nearly everyone believes in a fully open information flow, beyond some arguments about the particulars. Arguing about first principles is what we should be doing, not dissecting legal minutiae about Section 230 to claim that it’s acceptable to censor. Likewise, nearly everyone believes the other side are the same as us, but brainwashed by a culture that set out to brainwash society and does so in the full view of everyone who isn’t brainwashed.
We are sad about this, but remain hopeful for all those who haven’t truly wronged us. They don’t believe us. They have not taken seriously their own moral obligation to truly listen to the people closest to them when we come in good faith and on their behalf. We are trying to help them understand how world events are negatively impacting our lives and theirs, and they decline the conversation. We are, after all, on the other side. We remain open to forgiving this, knowing how powerfully they are being manipulated, if only they can come to terms with it.
We hope they do. We fear the consequences of people not waking up in time, before reality becomes undeniable. We want people to snap out of it for the sake of a peaceful, stable society and for their own good. One day they will understand exactly what they have supported and continue to support. An important part of our shared future depends on how many people get out in time, for society and for those still asleep.
The people on the other side are not the problem, they are being used. Without their awareness, they are submitting to the comfort that servitude provides, if they are willing to fully commit to servitude, in one form or another.
The people perpetrating this manipulation on our loved ones are the other side. But we do not try to censor them. We try to fully expose the truth about who they are and what they have done. We don’t want to cancel or kill them, that’s what they do. We want them to face justice and serve the sentence their legitimate, provable criminality demands. We want representation, legitimate courts, and legitimate elections. We want our human rights - the rights bestowed to us all, as humans. The Rights codified in our founding documents. Our birthrights. And we want the people to be made whole. We demand all of it.
None of this requires anyone being punished for their beliefs.
If nothing else, we demand our most basic right - the right to believe, to speak, to assemble, as we choose. It is our right as Americans.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Our current Congress not only enacts laws that directly violate the First Amendment, they collude with the most powerful companies on earth to eradicate it altogether. They destroy our rights most of all with illegitimate elections. They prohibit examining the elections or even speaking of them.
There is no greater distortion of reality than being told the people actually want things almost no one wants and that obviously fraudulent elections prove it. It is through this falsification that people submit to servitude, thinking it must be the people’s choice.
Truth Social promises to be the last bastion of unrestricted political speech. The legacy platforms will continue to increase their censorship to the point where almost no one goes uncensored at some point. If there is nowhere to turn after being censored, then free speech - as we know it - ends.
If you have spoken dangerous truths online, you are being censored in one way or another. You may not know it. You may be restricted or shadowbanned. You are definitely manipulated by the content you’re shown, which means you’re subject to the censoring of others. The Algorithm will choose your experience, one way or another. It will get its way.
If you have not yet been censored or manipulated, and you discuss politics online, it should be clear that you are not speaking the unapproved truth about politics. If you speak only approved “truths” about the most important issues in the history of mankind, you make yourself part of the problem.
You are not actually speaking about politics at all. You are doing free advertising for corporate sponsors in direct opposition to the good of your family, friends, and neighbors. You are almost definitely advertising in direct opposition to your own interests. You are one of the outermost branches of a pyramid scheme that stopped creating profit many levels above you. The benefits will not be realized. Blame the supply chain.
If you do not discuss politics online, you are still subject to what censorship produces - a constantly, and intentionally, false picture of the world. Once this false picture is fully adopted, contradictory information is rejected immediately as a belief of the other side. Even when the other side is right.
Especially when the other side is right. This is the only commandment: Thou shalt not believe anything the other side believes, no matter what.
The only standard of proof for any claim is the knowledge that the other side says it’s wrong. If the other side believes it, it must be wrong. The other side is always wrong. Because of who they are.
This is bigotry, and it is promoted society-wide. This is how hate movements start, and we are in the midst of a hate movement. The most powerful people and institutions in the world are working openly and directly for total and complete societal control. A large portion of society is currently promoting the permanent subjugation of others through the propagation of the false narrative.
They’ve selected who will be subjugated based on the set of beliefs they hold and express. These judges assume they will never be subjugated themselves, because of who they are. They are powerful. They are chosen. Well, at least they’re like the powerful and chosen, in terms of their expressed political positions. Same difference.
Kanye West is rich, famous, smart, and talented. He is one of the most popular artists in music history. He was recently suspended from Instagram for a day, based on what he was expressing. If it can happen to him, it can happen to you. If you have told the unapproved truth online, it has happened to you. If you one day find it in you to speak an unapproved truth online, it will happen to you.
The only way out of this problem is through the unrestricted access to information our First Amendment provides. Many believe that Truth Social represents the possibility of this promise.
While we don’t know what shape the Truth Social experience will ultimately take, people believe the technology is built to be constantly accessible and fully protective of free political speech. Truth Social CEO Devin Nunes seems to agree.
If Q posts (and @q posts) cause a massive, genuinely diverse community to research, analyze, vet, and communicate critical information, then the posts are a great value to humanity. If this process forces critical information into the collective consciousness, the potential for good is unbounded. If the mainstream media is forced to respond to an issue no one was supposed to know about (like the Ukrainian biolabs, for instance), it’s hard to argue that Q, @q, and the truth community are not making, and breaking, news.
What springs forth from the Q (and @q) posts is not only newsworthy, in many ways, it is the news.
This much should be clear:
· The media has spent years creating the “QAnon” bogeyman
· The bogeyman is amorphous and can be used to discredit anything
· Q posts stopped in December 2020, but “QAnon” is still referenced daily in “the news” and on TV
· @q appeared on Truth Social and began creating ‘@q posts’ and interacting with the Truth Social team and major figures in the America First movement
Why won’t the media cover it?
Because the bogeyman loses its ability to frighten when people understand the bogeyman. For the sake of the bogeyman’s effectiveness, people must never learn the reality.
The media tells you QAnon are responsible for this sort of thing:
But the reality is closer to this:
Would those violent QAnons hit criminals over the head with a shovel to protect an innocent, but mischievous, kid? I imagine they would, and many would be proud that they did. That’s not the worst kind of person to have around. They’d also share their stories and doubts with you in church. That sort of person is a good kind to have around as well.
The QAnons are not bogeymen. They’re American Patriots and regular citizens trying to take care of themselves and their loved ones while their unelected and uncaring government makes it harder, intentionally, by the day. They approach these troubles with faith and commitment. When they make mistakes, they accept them and adjust. They don’t believe they know everything, but they’re confident in what they know. They’re willing to defend what they know, and when they can’t, they’re willing to learn.
Some members of the truth community are willing to believe in ideas that others aren’t. Some have theories about what lurks in Deep Underground Military Bases (DUMBS). Some are obsessed with aliens. Many discuss ideas that strike people as utterly insane (people who think masks can stop aerosolized viral contagions) like adrenochrome, a real thing that must not be true. I don’t know if adrenochrome is harvested and consumed, as some describe it, but I know those people would be happy to support their beliefs and we could have a respectful conversation about it.
Is worrying about these things gullible or are is it open-minded? I guess that will depend on whether or who turns out to be right about important things, like Trump-Russia collusion being a hoax.
Worrying about DUMBS is not as crazy as believing that the definition of “woman” is unknowable for a non-biologist, as if serious biologists have a different scientific definition. The media’s sole purpose is creating a false reality. The audience is trained to be wrong about absolutely everything. That’s the goal. I will choose to listen to a loony QAnon every single time.
Nearly every person in the truth community knows far more about every relevant issue than virtually any Biden voter, yet we are told the opposite is true. Titles and credentials and diplomas are thin cover now. We can see the truth. Those who still support the illegitimate regime and its priorities have no clue why they believe anything. Everything they think they know is wrong, because everything they believe is a lie they’ve chosen to accept in service of making their lives ever easier.
They are unwilling to detach from the false reality because they imagine everything will fall apart. Instead, they double-down on the false reality again and again even as they bear witness to everything falling apart for everyone who isn’t them.
In doubling down, those who still support the illegitimate regime and its priorities agree to defend ever more depraved acts and events that strike against the moral conscience of everyone whose eyes are open to verifiable reality.
In the recent past they’ve been forced to defend propaganda, inflation, forced vaccination, racist hiring practices, child abuse, a slave trade on the border, censorship, the ability to control people’s spending, political imprisonment, and corrupt political dealings. Since the Ukraine “invasion” began, they’ve been convinced to defend their total indifference to war, actual Nazis, and lenient sentences for pedophilia. As the narrative shifts, they will soon be forced to rationalize election fraud and treason.
Those who still support the illegitimate regime and its priorities will defend these evils because they identify with the kind of people who are promoting these evils, and people like them cannot actually be bad. There is nothing that cannot be rationalize on these terms.
Who is more dangerous, the people who want to see these evils eliminated from our society, or the people who commit their existence to rationalizing and justifying them? In a sane world, this wouldn’t be a question.
QAnons didn’t spy on a campaign or a White House. QAnons didn’t mandate masks or lockdowns or the injection of an experimental gene therapy, none of which saved lives, all of which continue to leave disillusionment and devastation in their wake. QAnon didn’t plot to kidnap Michigan’s Governor or instigate violence at the Capitol on January 6th, federal law enforcement agencies were primarily responsible for both. QAnon didn’t kill police, burn cities, loot stores, or make all of that legal. That was BLM/Antifa and the people who fund and organize the group.
These are the facts. They don’t become fictions just because the media created a bogeyman to blame for all the problems in the world. The bogeyman exists so the very people who have, to this day, never considered they might be wrong don’t have to worry that their “side” is the problem.
The bogeyman exists because if all of us who have woken up or were never asleep aren’t inherently bad, the other side may have to think about what it means for them that they hate us. The bogeyman is now their North Star and they are led farther down the path. They are in an information war that they pretend isn’t happening. Everything they know is a lie. They are lost to the point where they don’t believe there’s a way back. The bogeyman is everything.
The media will not cover the re-emergence of Q on Truth Social because to do so would expose the reality - there is no bogeyman.
I HEART ANONS merch at www.cancelcouture.com or shop.spreadshirt.com/cancel-couture
Follow the podcast info stream: t.me/imyourmoderator or on Truth Social, Gab, or Gettr @imyourmoderator
Listen at: https://shows.acast.com/bereasonable/ or on your favorite (non-Spotify/Apple) podcast app
Who is 'Q'? Part Five: Where Did You Go? It Was Just Getting Good!
April 26, 2022 | Chris Paul on SubStack
The media helped create this hatred and oppression, and they got paid to it. Those “journalists”, who prefer having a blue checkmark to telling the truth, gleefully set about morally and intellectually justifying a movement designed to create bigotry on behalf of the most powerful people in the world and their agenda. These “journalists” do not understand that, in the days ahead, people will not look fondly on those who lied to them for profit and acclaim. They are still churning out new versions of their one QAnon article every time they want to make an idea dangerous to people who find ideas dangerous. They show no signs of stopping, despite the fact that Q stopped posting on December 8th 2020. Q disappeared, and yet “QAnon” is everywhere:
CNN calls the Ukrainian biolab “theory” a “false conspiracy theory”. Has CNN accepted there are true conspiracy theories?
As for the conspiracy theory itself - that researchers in Ukraine were working on weaponizing “high-threat pathogens” in US-funded labs near the Russia border - most of the key elements of the theory are already proven true, by the deniers’ own admission. Russia and QAnons do not conveniently share the same “false conspiracy theory”. Brazil, India, and China also formally called for investigations before the UN Security Council. Are they QAnons, or Russian propagandists? It’s getting hard to tell.
How do distinct parties with different (and often conflicting) priorities, all agree to believe the same “false conspiracy theories” without any coordination? It hardly seems possible. On the other hand, the media and tech companies in America (and globally) are owned by people who are publicly known, and proudly acknowledged, to be coordinating on projects to change the world in every way they can imagine. The Trusted News Initiative is one of these and the World Economic Forum is another.
It’s not a conspiracy theory that these organizations work in partnership toward a common messaging goal - it’s one of the primary reasons they exist! If there was a coordinated effort to present a false narrative to the world, would it be more likely among distinct groups with different priorities, or the organizations that coordinate what they do to achieve common goals?
The answer is obvious, but the media exists to convince us the opposite is true. Their goal is to convince everyone that the coordinated lies are not only true, but better for us. The only truth we can extract from the propaganda is that the propagandists are honestly telling us what they want us to believe.
From this, we can know what the coordinated organizations don’t want us to believe. Propaganda campaigns don’t only reward belief in the right things, they punish belief in the wrong things. They stigmatize everything that challenges the propaganda and they impose social, economic, and interpersonal costs on the failure to comply with the new boundaries.
There is nothing the media has stigmatized more than the mythical “QAnon”, and there is a reason for that. There is a reason they’ve continued, and even broadened, that stigmatization in the fourteen months since Q disappeared, with no promise of a return. Calling things “QAnon” has become its own stigmatization, as it deters people who’ve spent years thinking “QAnon is crazy” from considering any idea deemed “QAnon” by the same people who lie constantly, about everything, in the media.
In light of this obsession, one would think that the return of Q would be a massive story. “QAnon Goes Further Down the Rabbit Hole, Thinking Savior Has Returned”. Isn’t that what they would tell us?
Q may well have returned on the social media app that President Donald Trump spearheaded, but the media has remained silent… for weeks now.
Has Q returned? It’s a good question.
An account appeared on Truth Social with the handle “@q” on February 9th 2022, prior to the creation of the accounts of President Donald Trump and Truth Social CEO, Devin Nunes a day later.
Is there some way this could’ve been a mistake? Did some random hacker, attempting to “psyop” Trump supporters, rush through the gates and secure their account before the President of the United States (who, in some way, owns the platform) and the CEO of Truth Social secured theirs? There’s no reason to believe this, or even think it possible.
This was the first post by @q:
Upon witnessing it, you will immediately recognize how dangerous it is. The Olympics? 2026?
Chernobyl? What does it all mean? If you don’t immediately understand, it’s because it’s too “crazy” and “conspiratorial” for anyone to understand, isn’t it? Those nutty QAnons. This post came two weeks before Chernobyl was captured by Vladimir Putin, who is now, himself, a filthy QAnon. But that’s probably a coincidence, unrelated.
On February 23rd, Devin Nunes himself essentially announced @q’s presence on Truth Social with this post:
Cryptic, isn’t it? Before joining Truth Social, Devin Nunes was a Republican Congressman and Chair of the House Intelligence Committee. With Kash Patel and others, he brought the truth of the “Russian collusion” hoax to the American public.
His post immediately caught the attention of the small community who had early access to Truth Social, and spread to other platforms. Was the CEO of President Trump’s social media platform really directing attention to “QAnon”, the most dangerous conspiracy theory in the history of the world?
Maybe he was just asking the Truth Social tech team for the identity of Q in public rather than simply emailing them. That’s probably it.
That post sparked some interest, but it was too sudden, too strange. It can’t be Q, can it?
People began paying more attention to @q on February 24th. Coincidentally, this is the day Putin launched his “special military operation”, the goal of which was one of these:
· Lay waste to Ukraine, destroy the Ukrainian people, and reunite the Soviet Union before deciding to take over half of Europe and start World War III or
· Demilitarize an ostensibly neutral “buffer” country along Russia’s border, eliminate the Nazi element in Ukraine, neutralize US/globalist-funded bioweapons labs in the corrupt, global communist proxy-state, and decouple from the Central Banks
The first idea relies on assigned hatred and emotional engagement for agreement and belief. The second idea is a list of wholly rational priorities backed by extensive real-world evidence.
The mainstream media began a 24/7 effort to protect the corrupt proxy state and the comedic actor leading it.
The same day, former Chief of Staff to the Acting Secretary of Defense at the end of President Trump’s term, Kash Patel, had himself a beer with “Little Q”. Little Q, adorned in a very comfy flannel, confirmed that he (or she/they/zhem) was, in fact, having a beer with Kash Patel.
Soon after, to quell the rampant speculation of the deranged QAnons, they said the interactions between the higher-ups at Truth Social - believed to be not only in Trump’s inner circle, but potentially related to the Q information phenomenon - and the @q account, were just for fun. They were merely trolling the mainstream media.
“Attempts to Troll Media by Sending QAnon Followers Into Frenzy With Q’s Return” was not a headline that appeared anywhere in the media. Perhaps those genius bloggers who’d spent time on the theory that JFK Jr. was returning any minute (a claim explicitly denied by Q) were too savvy to fall for such a blatant attempt to confuse them.
Strange, isn’t it, that the media pretends “QAnon” believes this, even though Q denies it?
There’s been no shortage of articles covering Truth Social. The mainstream media points out that the app is only running on iPhones and hasn’t come online for Android users yet. They point out that the app isn’t available abroad and that a relatively small numbers of users have been able to make it through the onboarding process to access the app. The media ignores that hundreds of thousands of people, perhaps millions, remain on the waitlist, nor do they explain why access is limited.
The media consistently reports on every drop in the stock price of Digital World Acquisition Corp as proof that the app is a failure, and they have been for months.
This headline has proven false, and wasn’t true at the time it was written. The app was delivered to a limited audience on the pre-order date shown for months in Apple’s App Store. The public communications were that Truth Social would be out in Q1.
Twitter, Facebook, and Google all dealing with class action lawsuits by Donald Trump on behalf of the American people’s First Amendment. Public proof is emerging of Big Tech’s involvement in various crimes against humanity - facilitating biowarfare, election theft, the overthrow of legitimate governments, censorship, aid in human trafficking, child and sex trafficking, drug trafficking, etc… A platform wholly separate from big tech that is functional, stable, and allows free political speech, while avoiding actively trying to destroy its own product consumers, is a solid bet in the markets and otherwise. Even if the app was delayed, and it was not, the appetite for the app is growing, not shrinking. This is obviously fake news and it is targeted.
Since the app’s launch, media coverage has consistently tried to destroy the Truth Social brand before it reaches critical mass. There is zero chance the media accomplishes this. They have lost all credibility. Everyone on Truth Social, and the millions of people on the waiting list, understand that the onboarding of new users will be happening gradually, and for good reason. The Truth Social team hopes to keep the app free from ‘bots’.
Very few Americans understand that the massive follower numbers on the legacy social media platforms (Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube) are inflated by bots and manipulated by algorithms, as are ‘likes’ and engagement. Many of the comments on posts are simply fake. Bots exist to change people’s perception of the information they’re consuming. Knowing the platforms have this capacity and use it to achieve political ends, why should any of what is shown be believed?
YouTube was forced to remove the thumbs-down icon for a reason.
Side note: Before Spotify’s ‘Anchor’ podcast platform took my podcast down without warning, I discovered through sheer chance that the number of ‘plays’ of each episode were being assigned by algorithm. ‘Play count’ is the factor that determines a podcast’s payout. Should we expect that parent-company, Spotify, does any differently for the great musicians on their platforms? Artists are being swindled. The price quotes for Instagram influencers are determined by follower numbers and engagement. People pay to game these systems.
There is simply no reason to trust any of it. How much of what is currently happening in our world is a direct result of similarly blatant fraud? The algorithms tell us what’s okay to believe by showing us everyone else believes it. What would people feel free to believe and express if they hadn’t been convinced of their status as a tiny minority who must be evil or crazy for not supporting the new thing?
People have believed they were experiencing a genuine, human interaction through their phones that would reflect the real world, if only everyone crossed paths. That is a myth, and people are coming to understand that. While the reality of that interaction doesn’t exist, the possibility of it does.
People long for that possibility in a world that seems impossible to understand. The technology that could enable that transmission of information, that bond, has been used to eliminate it by people whose goal is the absolute control of everything. That’s not the fault of the technology, it’s the fault of corporate CEOs, governments, and the military-industrial complex that has (in part) built these platforms. At the very least, they have weaponized this information technology against the American people. This is not a conspiracy theory.
Legacy social media platforms are demoralization machines. The algorithms have a better psychological and behavioral profile of you than you have of yourself. They can easily manipulate your mood throughout the day. They can make you feel wrong about everything you see, think, and believe. They choose who will see your content and they choose whose content you will see.
Disagree with the new thing? They’ll feed counter-content until you believe that everyone else agrees with the new thing, leaving you as the outcast. Thankfully, the effect has largely worn off and people are not only deleting their profiles, but unlearning the behaviors that maintained their addiction.
The media has an endless appetite for blaming things on ‘QAnon’ and for trying to destroy Truth Social’s brand. They have done the same with other platforms, even going so far as to justify the complete takedown of Parler by Amazon Web Services, by saying it was necessary to deal with “The Insurrection”. One would think being able to brand Truth Social as “the platform of QAnon” would be a perfect marriage of two of their primary false narratives. And the return of Q? Think of the clicks!
While the media remains silent, @q has been quite active. Aside from Nunes and Patel, the Truth Social team interacts with @q as well. There have been memes, riddles, messages in Morse code, and strange “ReTruths” of influencers, but mostly memes. Like this one:
What an odd meme! What could it even mean? Well, part of it is another meme, so referential humor triggers immediately. The head is an emu, a flightless bird found in Australia. Russia invading Ukraine, yes, everyone knows that. China sending aircraft to Taiwan? What’s that all about? Well, who knows? But this happened in January and this happened more recently. People who pay attention to what’s happening in the world are already aware of this. If not, they would become curious enough to open an uncensored search engine and simply find out for themselves. So what about Australia?
Well, the illegitimate administration just decided to send thousands of American soldiers to Australia, but that’s probably not it.
I didn’t learn about any of the above incidents from the @q post, and I doubt @q even made the meme, though I don’t know. I learned about those incidents because they are extremely relevant in the world events that actually shape our lives - the events the media either lies about constantly or refuses to report altogether. The information ecosystem beyond legacy media and big tech exists to inform people about these sorts of events, because they matter.
We have been monitoring the China/Taiwan situation for months or years. Most Biden voters won’t know anything about China and Taiwan for another few weeks or few months. They will be told what to think by powerful and popular people who exist only to exploit them. They will believe what they’re told because they have no frame of reference and they will not be exposed to any contradictory opinions. They will be shown friends and family members on social media (but mostly strangers or bots or celebrities) who agree with them, to reassure them. It would only make sense to agree with their peers, so they will, and only for reasons that have nothing to do with the thing itself, nor whether they actually agree.
Sometimes Little Q gets more serious. Here @q is using whatever influence @q has to help the computer repairman whose life the American Deep State attempted to destroy.
After trying to contact Hunter Biden multiple times to remind him to get his laptop, John Paul Mac Isaac called law enforcement. He did exactly what any good citizen would have and should have done, and for doing so, his life was destroyed. Why? To cover up vast stores of evidence of the rampant corruption and criminality of the Biden family in Russia, Ukraine, China, and perhaps even Antarctica. Evidence of corruption and criminality implicating high-level members of numerous world governments is all over the hard drive. Evidence of dealings with Ukranian energy companies and Chinese Communist Party “businessmen”. Cryptic text messages from Hunter, worried that his brother Beau’s widow (with whom Hunter formed an open sexual relationship) would believe rumors she’d heard that Hunter was responsible for burning children alive in Donetsk. Did he do that? I don’t know. But Hunter worried that the woman he shared with his brother thought so. It’s on the laptop.
Part 6 to follow soon...
Who is 'Q'? Part Four: Tusted Voices, Authoritative Sources
Fake and corrupt Experts are not the only pollution in the mainstream information environment. Pop-culture-politics addicts get their intellectual confidence from the constant reassurance of being shown that the opinions of celebrities (and other important people) mirror their own views. There may be nothing that the sleepwalkers now “standing with” Ukrainian neo-Nazis enjoy more than feeling like they’re close to famous and powerful people.
People display their celebrity worship on social media. They attempt to interact with celebrity accounts, hoping to get the celebrity’s attention. They’re unaware many, if not most, prominent social media celebrities pay more per month than the average American monthly income to have professionals interact with their fans so they don’t have to do it themselves. Professional photographers are hired to capture their content. Captions are written for them in their voice. The platforms tell them what sort of posts they will be boosting, encouraging participation and incentivizing conformity. I spent almost 20 years in Hollywood. I know these people well. There are essentially only two kinds of political celebrities - closeted Trump supporters and people who don’t know a single true thing about politics, world events, history, philosophy, math, logic, statistics, or any of the other subjects they would have to understand to substantiate any of the things they say. They think being smart is reading Yuval Noah Harari books. I know a handful of closeted celebrity Trump supporters, to be sure. I know hundreds in the second category. In the past two years they shed family and friends who disagreed with them, because their public image couldn’t stand the association. They are surrounded with people who will agree with everything they say. Are they happy? No, but they look happy on Instagram, and no matter what, at least (for now) they’re rich.
The filthy QAnons must get their opinions from those scant few celebrities who don’t repeat the slogans, right? Or do those few smart celebrities get their slogans downstream from the QAnons? It’s hard to tell.
Jennifer Aniston is a “cool”, “smart”, “funny” actress whose career consisted of being pretty while reading sitcom dialogue and marrying famous men. She gets paid taxpayer money to repeat the Slogans as a political influencer online.
Rob Schneider is an actual funny and smart person who is open-minded enough to read and moral enough to discern truth. He states his own opinions on social media at great personal cost to himself.
Which one is considered an authoritative™ source of proper political opinions? Neither of them should be, nor should anyone else! With the help of massive PR campaigns, one of them is. How would her fans feel if they knew she was paid money from the covid relief package to amplify the message of those strongly in favor of never-ending covid? Perhaps I’m wrong. People who are still Jennifer Aniston fans clearly would not care and the ones who would will never find out.
Anons are the opposite of celebrities. Anonymity will do that. They’re doing historical investigative journalism on the most interesting and important stories in world history and analyzing current events as a community. They care solely for improving cultural understanding about all those things our culture hides from our view. It may be impossible to understand for people who still find self-worth in likes and comments from strangers, but Anons do what they do because they find value and fulfillment in the work, selflessly and without material reward.
Those awful QAnons also include an absolutely disproportionate number of American veterans who’ve already pledged their lives to upholding the American Constitution. They are mocked by Elites™ because, to them, upholding the American Constitution is an antiquated notion that was held when people were so ignorant, they didn’t even spend their days staring at screens. The Elites and people like them would prefer to eliminate the Constitution, rewrite all history in their image, and then follow whatever the Experts say for the rest of their lives. Because they will occasionally be able to go on vacation, they will consider themselves free.
How must these conspiracy-theorist veterans who’ve seen combat feel when going to head-to-head with a Vassar gender studies major in information combat discussing, for instance, the actual history of Ukraine or the risks of a no-fly zone? #wemustclosethesky
Perhaps the preposterous mismatch in functional intelligence within applicable fields of knowledge is what produces utter dominance on the meme battlefield. It’s impossible to make truly informed people laugh at a joke that relies on something false for its humor. Memes from the mainstream get destroyed because they’re false. The more viral the false content goes, the more the person who posted it will be exposed as ignorant.
How can an information war be won without humor? Where can humor be found for people who don’t know anything true?
What good is attention when the more of it you get, the dumber you look? We could ask Chrissy Tiegen this question, but she virally displayed her malice and ignorance so often, she finally deleted Twitter to escape the consequences of her being herself online. But hey, she’s rich and famous, and that’s as good as life can get.
There is no “QAnon conspiracy theory”. There is only information and the vast array of conclusions people draw from the information. Two years ago, no one in the mainstream thought we’d be coerced into being injected with an experimental technology for a disease with a fatality rate of an average flu. Everyone outside the mainstream already knew. Foresight actually does matter when facing the most important decisions in one’s life. The people utilizing that foresight were called crazy.
For being correct too early.
No one should be called crazy for thinking that children are trafficked in underground tunnels when we know child trafficking exists and we know tunnels exist and are used to traffic drugs, and potentially, other things. It’s certainly not as crazy as believing that the way to solve racism is by making everything in life about race.
Anons are not seeking anything but a mass cultural awakening to the dark truths in this world that people with weak character dare not know. These dark truths run our lives, distance our families, prevent our success, rob us of the benefits of our work, suppress our freedom of speech, degrade our religions and beliefs, and deny our right to seek accountability.
The awakening is crucial, because concentration camps exist in a country who has compromised the man pretending to be our president. Because there is a slave trade on our southern border.
Because children are trafficked to pleasure and compromise those in power. Because there are people who actually do know how JFK was assassinated, but you’re not allowed to be one of them.
Because our country is being subsumed by a global world order that requires vaccine passports, environmental impact and social credit scores, and global digital currency. Because people think none of this will ever affect them.